Cubist Collage

Collage and the Modern Age

Both scholars listed below agree on the centrality of collage to modernist art; they disagree only in how broadly they define Modernism. Greenberg focuses wholly on developments within the field of painting, while Hopkins speaks of culture in the broadest sense: literature, film, etc.

Scholarly Reading: Two Perspectives on Collage

  • Clement Greenberg, “The Pasted-Paper Revolution” (1958) (Blackboard)
  • Budd Hopkins, “Modernism and the Collage Aesthetic” (1997) (Blackboard)

Viewing: Analytic and Synthetic Cubism

  • Pablo Picasso, Les Demoiselles d’Avignon (1907)
  • Georges Braque, Violin and Palette (1909)
  • Pablo Picasso, Still Life with Chair Caning (1911)
  • Georges Braque, Homage to J. S. Bach (1911-12)
  • Pablo Picasso, Guitar, Sheet Music and Wine Glass (1912)
  • Juan Gris, The Table (1914)

Writing: Respond to ONE of the following prompts. Keep your response short, posting as a reply under the appropriate heading in the comments section:

  1. Point to ONE quality that these Cubist works share in common with the Futurist art we examined last week. Alternatively, point to something that makes them distinct.
  2. Drawing on Greenberg or Hopkins—or just pointing to the art itself, should Cubist collage be classed as mimetic or expressive art? Or some third thing?

Comments are closed.